Internal development of Google’s Chrome OS is expected to finalize  late this year, with products launching in early 2011. Chrome OS is a cloud-oriented  operating system targeted at heavy internet users. Over the last few years,  Google has been launching many different online applications, such as Google  Docs, Voice, and (of course) acquiring YouTube. The final intent for these  projects is to provide the consumer with desktop-comparable applications that  will run with ease on cheap netbook computers. Recently, YouTube has entered an  HTML5 beta to test how well videos can be streamed without use of bulky and  resource hungry applications such as Adobe Flash. With Chrome browser being  HTML5 compatible, it makes a perfect match for netbooks.
Schmidt is expects netbooks running Google’s Chrome OS to sell for around $300 to $400—which isn’t surprising considering most netbooks are priced in that range. Google will be offering Chrome OS free of charge, so the price of a Chrome OS powered netbook is mostly the cost of production. What advantages will Chrome OS have against Windows? It’s hard to say specifically—there has been plenty of speculation, but we won’t know until the final product launches.
"It will be up to the manufacturers who do it, but the price points you should think about are the current netbook pricings which are 300 dollar, 400 dollar price points.”I’m sure that we will be able to see great integration amongst Google products. Such as the Android mobile OS, Google online services, and anything else Google may possibly launch.
UltraVPN is a client/server SSL VPN solution based on OpenVPN. It encrypts and anonymizes  your network connection.
UltraVPN is a simple user interface to connect or disconnect to our  VPN servers. 
To use UltraVPN, you need to right click on a traybar icon (on the  bottom right of your screen) that looks like a computer with a red  screen. After right clicking on it, choose "connect". 

What can you do with UltraVPN?
UltraVPN 1.0

Windows only: If you use Windows  Media Center to manage your movies, TV shows, and music, then you need  to grab Media Browser, an open-source plug-in that displays your  downloaded media and all its associated metadata and artwork in one  slick layout.
After installing the free, open-source Media  Browser plug-in, it only takes a few minutes to zip through the one-time  setup wizard and choose which media you'd like the tool to aggregate  for you. Then fire up Windows Media Center, and the Media Browser option  will be listed among the Center's native Movie, TV, and Music choices.
Media Browser only works on Windows Vista and Windows 7. What kinds  of plug-ins improve your Windows Media Center experience? Kick around  your ideas in the comments.
Media Browser

If you're big on BitTorrent, chances are you've heard of  the popular BitTorrent clients uTorrent  and Vuze (previously Azureus). According to a  study highlighted by all-things-BitTorrent blog TorrentFreak, uTorrent download  speeds outpace Vuze speeds by up to 30% on some ISPs.
The research revealed a remarkable speed difference with uTorrent users getting 16% higher download speeds than Vuze users. On average uTorrent users reached a 176 Kbps download speed while Vuze users were stuck at 151 Kbps on the same torrents and with the same ISPs.

The reason for the speed disparity: Researchers believe that variations in the way the applications distribute peers, how they handle connections, and how they discover new peers influences the speed. If you aren't already using uTorrent—our readers' favorite BitTorrent client—these results seem to provide compelling reasons to switch. Hit up the full post over at TorrentFreak for more details.

Windows: If you're a devotee of Firefox's add-ons and features but would like just a tad more operation speed, Pale Moon might be perfect, at least for a trial run. The custom and extension-compatible Firefox build seems just a bit snappier.
It's a relative measurement, of course, to note that Pale Moon, built and compiled specifically for Windows operation, tests out 25 percent ahead of Firefox in certain SunSpider rendering and scripting tests. As we've noted in our browser speed tests, browser testing suites can be subjective, and don't always translate to real-world experience. Then again, using Pale Moon for the better part of a morning, I could guess at feeling pages like Gawker.com and Slashdot loading a tad faster than in Firefox, which I kept open for side-by-side testing. Pale Moon should work with most of your extensions, too, and if you install it in a non-portable fashion, it picks up your existing Firefox profile and runs with it.
Pale Moon is a free download for Windows systems only. Tell us how it performs for you in the comments.
 
(CBS)  I didn't get into F.E.A.R. until the sequel,  F.E.A.R. 2 (F2), two years back; and aside from being occasionally creped out at  times, I enjoyed my experience. Admittedly my initial reactions to the first  "Alma" sighting was much like a grade school student seeing their parent naked  for the first time unintentionally. Though a bit squeamish at the outset I  played through F2 with renewed zeal to conquer my fear of the dark. 
In  some instances of the game I was reminded of specific scenes from the movie "The  Ring". Alma, the ultimate antagonist in this franchise, struck a very striking  resemblance to Samara, the little girl who's voice you would he auspiciously  hear after watching a tape and would presumably kill you in 7 days time.  
F.E.A.R. 2 had a very interesting ending where we know Alma lives since  the last image Becket, the protagonist, has is her being pregnant. Those of you  have played the game to the end know the scene being referenced so we won’t  discuss who the - ahem - father is. That said it was only logical that there be  a third iteration. But like many other games that follow this path, will  F.E.A.R. 3 pale in comparison to its predecessors? 
Based on the press  release that Warner Bros. Interactive Entertainment (WBIE) sent out today, that  might not be the case. The next version of the game will introduce a cooperative  (co-op) mode. This could add some interesting play elements but only time will  tell. Check out the following press release
As  reported before, Adobe’s fifth iteration of their professional (and  outrageously priced) Creative Suite product would be released today. And so it  has.
The new suite focuses “on interactivity, performance and maximizing the  impact of digital content and marketing campaigns”. Plus, there’s the new Adobe  Flash Catalyst 11 program added to the suite. The update also includes the new  Flash Player 10.1 and Adobe AIR 2 components.
CS5 comes in five flavors: Master Collection, Design Premium, Design  Standard, Web Premium, and Production Premium. These flavors will cost you  $2599, $1899, $1299, $1799, and $1699, respectively.
You can learn more by reading the full press release here.

